The faculty of the Department of Social Science & Cultural Studies is pleased to announce its Senior Thesis Award winners for Spring 2013! Congratulations to all of our Seniors!
Distinction
Alexander J. Danckwerth.
From Weimar to Deleuze: The Early Time-Image of the German Film. (Excerpt below.)
Andrea González.
Post War Violence in Guatemala: The Case of Linchamientos. (Excerpt below.)
Honors
Amanda Picotte.
The “Dark, Evil, Enemy Within” - Violent Implications of Ideology and Rhetoric in Reagan’s War on Drugs.
Zachary Slanger.
Perverse Strategies.
Research and Methodology
Andrea González.
Post War Violence in Guatemala: The Case of Linchamientos.
Foundation for Graduate Work
Drohan J.W. DiSanto.
Relational Aesthetics and Site-Specificity.
Lara
Kleinschmidt.
“Sometimes, there’s a man. And I’m talkin’ about the
Dude here”: Achieving, Abiding, and Lebowski as a Way of Life.
Faculty Thesis Recognition Award
Katrina Bayoneto.
Confronting Nightmares: Dystopian Science Fiction Films of the Late 1990s.
Catherine Frazier.
Residual Anxiety: On Fine Artists and the Market.
Chelsea Miller.
"American Satirical Audiences Better Informed, the Relationship Between Satire and Cultural Awareness"
Gretchen Spiegel.
Living in Exile: On Nostalgia and the Ethics of Remembrance.
Andrea González. Post War Violence in Guatemala: The Case of Linchamientos.
My thesis explores the visual aspects of violence in Guatemalan indigenous communities. Specifically, I explore the role of the visual, and what I refer to as the aesthetic of cruelty, as it is enacted in the recent resurgence of linchamientos (lynchings) in the case of Guatemala.
The recent emergence of violence in Guatemala's public sphere demands that we rethink both the reasons behind this violence and the future role of local and national conceptions of justice. This recent resurgence of violence speaks to the need to reclaim a commitment to human rights, especially in an environment ravaged by both “invisible” and “visible” forms of violence. The case of Guatemala is a powerful lens by which I will explore this dynamic. In this thesis I will show how the contemporary visual culture of violence in Guatemala is bond to the history of Guatemalans; specifically extralegal forms of violence that emerged in the country Guatemala during and after the civil war (1960-1996). I will explain why, after the civil war, linchamientos emerged as a new form of extralegal violence in indigenous Mayan communities in many parts of the countryside.
.....
The linchamientos that are propelled by Mayan and ladino communities, known as “popular lynchings” (Snodgrass) emerge as the reaffirmation of a struggle made visible. Communal bonds were devastated during the Civil War. As Girard recalls, the “sacrificial crisis” is founded in the cultural order, when there is lack of cultural distinction. A culture so based on the image of their patrons, on the verges of depletion makes visibility out of violence: “violence has become a collective ritual that comes to solvent the total loss of community cohesion that very much was based on the use of the image.”
Linchamientos are protests by means of “divine, sovereign” violence (Benjamin) to manifest existence. The shift of violence in the postwar years responds to a new form, for the state of exception to turn into a state of necessity, which can shift inhumanity into humanity. This is the notion of “crime as distinctiveness” that Snodgrass mentions.
The legacy of the Civil War as Snodgrass describes is mainly invisibility. Linchamientos make visible the space of the state of exception by its focus on the body. And for Agamben, these linchamientos embody a lacuna:
It is as if the juridical order (il diritto) contained an essential fracture between the position of the norm and its application, which, in extreme situations, can be filled only by means of the state of exception, that is, by creating a zone in which
application is suspended, but the law (la legge), as such, remains in force.
After the Civil War, the “ideological polarization” that already existed has been
magnified. Guatemalan identity is a perforated concept. In her testimony, Rigoberta Menchú remembers us how the barriers between Mayan communities and ladinos has been instrumental for the elite class that runs the country, to keep the groups oppressed. Linchamientos express visibly the Mayan struggle towards recognition from the power apparatus; they embody the tension point with the state. On one hand, their exclusion is included by its own exception (Agamben); there is a resistance to the elimination of the state of exception. On the other hand, in the space that linchamientos create, there also exists a resistance to this resistance. The visual culture of linchamientos shows “the paradoxical nature of violence” (Girard) where evil and the one who combats evil are the same. It is as if violence came from without. In this regard, Agamben writes,
In the modern era, misery and exclusion are not only economic or social concepts but eminently political categories…In this sense, our age is nothing but the implacable and methodical attempt to overcome the division dividing the people, to eliminate radically the people that is excluded.
Linchamientos make visible the created differences of the peoples of Guatemala in relation to the judicial system. These differences take place in “the domain of the corporeal and the realm of the images” (Carlin). Different peoples (Agamben) and subaltern interests collide in this space. This is the spacemade visible in the body, of the Mayan struggle, also where ladinos and Mayans struggle between themselves and against the state; in a zone where basic human rights aren’t guaranteed. Linchamientos keep redrawing the line of the state of exception (Agamben); one side to maintain it, the other to eliminate it."
Alexander J. Danckwerth. From Weimar to Deleuze: The Early Time-Image of the German Film.
The school of films known as German expressionist has long been historically pinned to very specific and particular meanings. The following is an attempt to think of the films of Germany’s Weimar Republic in a new manner, both in the context of their film-historical understanding and significance as well as within the specific framework of Gilles Deleuze’s two volumes on cinema, Cinema 1: The Movement-Image and Cinema 2: The Time-Image. I will argue that Deleuze only hints at the potential significance of these films due to his reading of them partly being informed (and as such, limited) by Siegfried Kracauer and Lotte Eisner’s seminal texts, From Caligari to Hitler and The Haunted Screen. These two texts are largely responsible for the historically accepted ‘version’ of what those films must have meant, hence the purpose of this paper in trying to think of them in a “new manner.”
I will first examine the fallacies of the film and art-historical readings of Weimar cinema by Kracauer and Eisner to show how they have created a rigid and impenetrable “historical imaginary” of the films (as posited by Thomas Elsaesser.) This reading ultimately limits the potential of the films to be critically analyzed and understood in other ways, outside of locating some dark element in the German soul reflected in the films that foreshadows the rise of Hitler and the Third Reich. Then I will show how Deleuze’s appraisal of these films follows in line with Kracauer and Eisner’s readings, and that despite his call to “look in pre-war cinema, and even in silent cinema for the workings of a very pure time-image which has always been breaking through,” he himself never returns to the films (which sit firmly in his “classical,” pre-World War II grouping) to unlock the further potential they have within his own cinematic project and for cinema in general.
....
I also want to point out that even with the analysis I have attempted, there is much more that could be said about these specific films in the context of Deleuze’s film theory, as the cinema books themselves contain such amazing depth. As such, I have only laid out a preliminary introduction to what an application of Deleuze’s theory to a specific set of films can do for both the films and the theory. For example the significance of Hitler in Deleuze’s cinema books and the notion of Hitler’s methods as metacinematic is another intensely rich topic to be explored within this field, but would require its own equally lengthy treatment to do it justice. But, hopefully with the incentive giving the German expressionist films a new treatment with Deleuze, that question can also be delved into. Much like the presence of the time-image in these films, the importance of Nazi Germany as exemplary of a metacinematic real life function also seems to be peeking around many of the corners in Deleuze’s cinema books.
More exciting than the prospect of applying Deleuze’s already-made ideas and signs to a study of film’s history is the idea that the theory can be extended in new and previously un-thought of ways, which is already taking place contemporarily with both filmmakers and theorists advancing Deleuze’s ideas (mostly in the realm of digital and cyber video that is only touched on at the end of Cinema 2.) At the same time it is important to flush out the connections in early cinema as well, to gain the most complete vision of the time-image. The pure images of time and thought, the images that must be read as much as seen are the ones that Deleuze ends his books with. He feels these are the images that constitute the most cinematically engaged films of his time and will access new images later times. Yet he is always aware of the fluid nature of the cinematic signs he identifies; “from classical to modern cinema, from the movement-image to the time-image…it is always possible to multiply the passages from one regime to the other, just as to accentuate their irreducible differences” (Deleuze Cinema 2 279.) It is this subtle awareness in his own theories that makes it easier to suggest Deleuze did not miss a connection between the time-image and Weimar cinema but rather leaves readers with a vast number of open ideas to explore, images to connect, and concepts to furnish with the ideas he provides.
Distinction
Alexander J. Danckwerth.
From Weimar to Deleuze: The Early Time-Image of the German Film. (Excerpt below.)
Andrea González.
Post War Violence in Guatemala: The Case of Linchamientos. (Excerpt below.)
Honors
Amanda Picotte.
The “Dark, Evil, Enemy Within” - Violent Implications of Ideology and Rhetoric in Reagan’s War on Drugs.
Zachary Slanger.
Perverse Strategies.
Research and Methodology
Andrea González.
Post War Violence in Guatemala: The Case of Linchamientos.
Foundation for Graduate Work
Drohan J.W. DiSanto.
Relational Aesthetics and Site-Specificity.
Lara
Kleinschmidt.
“Sometimes, there’s a man. And I’m talkin’ about the
Dude here”: Achieving, Abiding, and Lebowski as a Way of Life.
Faculty Thesis Recognition Award
Katrina Bayoneto.
Confronting Nightmares: Dystopian Science Fiction Films of the Late 1990s.
Chelsea Miller.
"American Satirical Audiences Better Informed, the Relationship Between Satire and Cultural Awareness"
Gretchen Spiegel.
Living in Exile: On Nostalgia and the Ethics of Remembrance.
Zachary's senior thesis project, Perverse Strategies, examined the notion of the perverse, especially in relation to the work of the French psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan. In Living in Exile: On Nostalgia and the Ethics of Remembrance, Gretchen explored the ethical dimensions and quandaries of memory, identity and nostalgia as both active individual and collective practice as well as a potentially reactionary social force.
